Sports Direct is facing a further crunch shareholder vote after recommending the retailer pay boss Mike Ashley’s brother £11m.
John Ashley holds a senior IT position at the company – founded by his younger sibling.
Sports Direct said on Friday that an internal probe it commissioned had found that he missed out on a series of benefits that were not made available to him for fear they would be seen as inappropriate – given his ties to the billionaire tycoon – since the company’s 2007 flotation.
The joint report by the firm’s legal advisers RPC and independent accountants Smith & Williamson found he had been paid less than “other senior executives who helped build the company”.
Sports Direct said it would stage the shareholder vote at its Shirebrook HQ in Derbyshire on 13 December and confirmed that Mike Ashley would not take part.
Video: Mike Ashley responds to his critics
Its statement read: “Due to the unique circumstances of this matter, independent shareholders will now vote at the general meeting on a resolution to pay John Ashley £11m for services provided during his employment with the company.
“The board, including Mike Ashley, will abstain from the vote, although they are supportive of the resolution.”
Mike Ashley added: “I intend to voluntarily abstain from the vote on whether or not John should receive the money that he would otherwise have earned at Sports Direct if he were not my brother.
“I fully expect that independent shareholders will vote against this proposal due to the passage of time involved, although in my opinion, technically the money is owed and therefore should be paid.
Video: Sports Direct boss tells court he is a ‘power drinker’
“It’s important for me to say that if John had owed one pound to Sports Direct, I would have ensured any sum was repaid in full. I hope shareholders will therefore be reassured that everything is in order and that any concerns are laid to rest.
“I always put the interests of Sports Direct ahead of my own.”
The last two years have been something of a rollercoaster for the company and Mr Ashley personally.
Sports Direct implemented a series of workplace and pay reforms amid a backlash from politicians and investors on its treatment of staff.
:: Sports Direct investors offer chairman a lifeline
The furore mainly concentrated on its sprawling Shirebrook warehouse which faced union claims of “Victorian” conditions.
But it also brought corporate governance at Sports Direct into sharp focus for shareholders, whose voting power is limited given Mr Ashley’s personal majority stake.
Mr Ashley, who is currently trying to sell Newcastle United, was embroiled in a bizarre court case earlier this year in which he was accused of reneging on a deal in a £14m damages action – a case he won.
Mr Ashley told the High Court judge in the case that while he was a “power drinker” who liked to get drunk, he would never make major business decisions in a pub as had been alleged.